Gareth
I knew I wanted to teach the moment I walked into that science club at Ormskirk High. It was a Thursday evening in my final year at Lancaster, and I'd volunteered to help with their after-school physics group. These were kids who'd written themselves off as "not science people," but when we started building circuits and launching rockets, everything changed. One lad, Marcus, had been getting detention every week for disrupting lessons. When his LED circuit lit up for the first time, his face transformed. That's when I understood what my sister's maths teacher had done for her years earlier – turned frustration into fascination.
I applied to Edge Hill University's physics teacher training programme in September 2023, and when my acceptance letter arrived, I felt that same electric moment as Marcus. The government offered £24,000 bursaries for physics teachers – more than enough to live on while training. Physics was a shortage subject, they said. The country needed people like me. I started imagining my own classroom, my own experiments, my own chance to turn those "I can't do physics" moments around.
In November, I called the Department for Education to confirm my bursary application. The woman on the phone sounded tired. "I'm sorry, the physics bursary has been suspended for this academic year due to budget constraints." Budget constraints. The words sat there between us like a wall I couldn't see around. She explained that they'd had to prioritise other subjects, that these decisions were made at Treasury level, that she understood how disappointing this must be.
I tried Teach First instead. Their website talked about getting outstanding graduates into challenging schools, about making a difference where it mattered most. When I called their North West office, the response was polite but final: their physics places were already filled. "We'd love to have you next year," the recruiter said, "but this year's cohort is complete."
Lancashire County Council ran school-based training routes. Surely they'd want someone local, someone who understood the area. The coordinator I spoke to was sympathetic. "We'd love to take you on, but without the bursary funding, schools can't afford to support trainees. They're barely covering their existing staff costs." Schools can't afford it. The government can't afford it. Everyone was sorry, everyone understood, but nobody could help.
I started walking past my old school more often. Ormskirk High looked exactly the same – red brick buildings, teenagers streaming through the gates, the physics labs I remembered from my own A-levels. The head teacher, Mrs Henderson, remembered me from prize day. When I explained what had happened, her expression shifted from pleased recognition to weary frustration. "We desperately need a physics teacher," she said. "Mr Davies retired in July and we've been covering his classes with supply staff. But we simply don't have the budget to train someone without government support."
That phrase again. No budget. No money. Everyone wanted the same thing – schools needed physics teachers, graduates wanted to train, students needed proper lessons – but somehow the money that would make it happen had vanished.
Then I discovered something that made no sense. Through a friend still at Edge Hill, I learned that their teacher training building had twenty empty places on the physics programme. Twenty places, sitting there, unfilled, because the bursaries had been cut. The lecture halls were there. The practice classrooms were there. The university tutors were there, employed and ready to teach. What was missing were the £24,000 payments that would let people like me take those places.
Walking home through our estate that evening, I bumped into Sarah from three doors down. We'd been in the same year at school, both studied physics at different universities. She'd been unemployed for eight months, she told me, after being turned away from the same programme for the same reason. She was working in a call centre now, helping people dispute their phone bills. "Bit different from quantum mechanics," she said with a bitter laugh.
There it was, the contradiction I couldn't ignore anymore. Sarah existed. I existed. The empty training places existed. The desperate schools existed. The students who needed physics teachers existed. When Mrs Henderson said "there's no budget," what exactly was she talking about? The government that prints the pound notes had decided not to print enough of them to connect willing teachers to empty training places to desperate schools.
I used to accept the excuse that there was no money. I hear it differently now. The government that prints the notes and mints the coins told me it could not find enough of them to train the people who were standing right there, ready to work. The real question was never about money. It was about whether the people existed, whether the skills could be taught, whether the materials were available. They were. All of them.
The excuse was not a fact. It was a choice wrapped in the language of impossibility. It is the same logic as a household that says "we cannot afford it," except a household does not issue its own currency. The government does. The limit was never the money. The limit was the willingness to spend it into the places and the people who needed it.
I understand now that this is not just my story. It is the story of every constituency where people and needs exist side by side while someone in Westminster says the cupboard is bare. Sarah is still in that call centre. The physics labs at Ormskirk High are still being covered by supply staff. The empty training places at Edge Hill are still empty. And somewhere in Whitehall, someone is still saying there is no money to connect them, as though money grows on trees instead of flowing from the institutions that create it.
Logical Fallacy
What Gareth experienced has a name.
Constructing an argument that sounds reasonable but contains a fundamental flaw in reasoning.
Every time someone told Gareth "there is no money," they were using the false analogy of a household budget. Households must earn before they spend, save before they invest, find money before they use it. This seems so obvious that we apply it everywhere, including to the government that issues the currency itself. But a currency issuer works nothing like a currency user.
When HM Treasury says it cannot afford teacher training bursaries, it is applying household logic to an institution that creates money by spending it. The pounds for those bursaries do not need to be found – they need to be issued. The constraint was never sterling. It was the political decision to create those pounds and direct them to teacher training instead of somewhere else.
The resources existed. The people existed. The decision not to connect them was political, not financial.